Legal Opinion

Caughren v. Kahan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1915No. 12295PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sessions, J., entered January 2, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action of replevin.

1Opinion of the Court

Holcomb,. J.

In an action of replevin brought by appellants against the respondents, tried before a jury, the jury returned a verdict for the respondents and found the value of the property to be $900. From a judgment entered thereon, this appeal is taken.

The property in controversy was a quantity of iron rails and scrap iron which had been theretofore used in the.business of appellants. Appellants are a firm of railroad contractors having an office in Spokane, Washington. Mr. Caughren, one of the members of the firm, resides at Sauk Center, Minnesota. Woldson, the other member, resides in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Forsyth v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hall v. HinksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williamson v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Funk v. HorrocksWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Fisher v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Lydon v. Exchange National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Fenlon v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API