Legal Opinion

Easton v. Littooy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1916No. 13439PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered January 15, 1916, in favor of the plaintiff, upon an agreed statement of facts, in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

Action to foreclose a mortgage for default in payment of interest. The sole defense was payment of the first coupon alleged to be in default and discharge of the others and of the principal note by tenders when due, wrongfully rejected. The cause was tried on stipulated facts. On September 1, 1908, one Mary M. Gans, mother of defendant, Mabel Gans Littooy, executed and delivered to one M. L. Bevis her note for $2,500, due January 1, 1918, with ten interest coupons attached, each, save the first, being for $175, and maturing, respectively, January 1 of each year after date. The note and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kortright v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Renard v. ClinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Murray v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Quinn v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Western Security Co. v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hilmes v. MoonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. First National Bank of Seattle v. HessellWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Koppler v. BuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Pfeiffer v. HeyesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Hohn v. MorrisonColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API