Monroe Mill Co. v. Menzel
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, entered May 2, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, enjoining interference with plaintiff’s use of a stream for the purpose of floating shingle bolts.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
The respondent brought this action against appellant to procure an injunction against an alleged threatened interference with the use of a stream for the floating of shingle bolts. The stream is known as the West Dork of Woods creek. It commences at the foot of Lake Boesiger, in Snohomish county, and flows therefrom in a southwesterly direction, passing through the lands of both appellant and respondent Bespondent owns an extensive body of timber lands adjacent to' the lake and stream, and owns the lands upon both sides of the stream at its source. Appellant’s lands lie below those of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Hathaway v. Yakima Water, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- City of New Whatcom v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- Watkins v. DorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Sultan Water & Power Co. v. Weyerhauser Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Port of Seattle v. Oregon & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Grays Harbor Boom Co. v. LownsdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Sholin v. Skamania Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Burrows v. Grays Harbor Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.