Legal Opinion

Joint School Dist. No. 132 v. Dabney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 1927No. 18497PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.

This is an original action brought in this court to compel by a writ of mandamus the Attorney General, as ex officio bond commissioner of the state of Oklahoma, to approve a certain bond issue in the sum of $2,000, authorized by the voters of tne joint school district No. 132, located in the counties of Major and Alfalfa, state of Oklahoma.

The refusal and the reasons given therefor by the defendant to approve said bond issue are shown from a copy of the following letter, which is made a part of the defendant’s answer to the petition of the plaintiffs:

“June 3, 1927.
“No. 6529, Joint School…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Board of Comm'rs of Tippecanoe Cty. v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Smith v. School Trustees.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Woodruff v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Egan Consolidated School District Number 1 v. Minnehaha CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Comanche CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Thurman v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 128District Court, D. Kansas · 1950
  4. City of Tulsa v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Driskell v. Independent School District Number One of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API