Vance Trucking Co., Inc. v. Phillips
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
“A motion for a directed verdict raises the question as to whether there is sufficient evidence to go to the jury.” Shuford, N.C. Civil Practice and Procedure § 50-5, p. 410. “The plaintiff’s evidence must be taken as true and be considered in the light most favorable to him. ... All conflicts in the evidence must be resolved in the plaintiff’s favor and ... [contradictions, conflicts and inconsistencies which appear in the evidence are to be resolved in the plaintiff’s favor.” Id. “Acts of contributory negligence not alleged in the answer should be ignored.” Bowen v. Gardner, 275…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Atkins v. MoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Ryder v. BenfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- McNeil v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Sessoms v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Shore v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Gulledge v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Shore v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999