Shore v. Farmer
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Defendant Ray Farmer, t/d/b/a Ray Farmer Bonding, appeals the judgment of the trial court, arguing the court (1) “abused its discretion in allowing [p]laintiff to [a]mend her [c]omplaint . . . after the close of all of the evidence;” and (2) “erred by submitting the issue of [p]unitive [d]amages to the [j]ury.” Defendant also assigns error to certain comments by the trial court. Plaintiff Jenny Barbee Shore cross-assigns as error the court’s “failure to submit the issue of . . . unfair and deceptive trade practice[s] to the jury.” We conclude the trial court committed no…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. TrullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Dailey v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cash v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Shore v. FarmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- VF Jeanswear Ltd. Partnership v. MolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Yancey v. LeaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.