Legal Opinion

Ryder v. Benfield

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1979No. 7925SC43PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

First, defendant assigns error to the denial of his timely motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Defendant argues that the evidence fails to disclose any breach of duty on his part. To the contrary, he asserts, the evidence shows contributory negligence as a matter of law “because [plaintiff] was or should have been aware of the condition which he alleged resulted in his injury.”

In ruling on defendant’s motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the test is whether the evidence was sufficient to entitle…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Deaton v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Wheeler v. DentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Deaton v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Maness v. Fowler-Jones Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. FloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Shelton v. STEELCASE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Cox v. Robert C. Rhein Interest, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Goble v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Ellis v. OliverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API