Sessoms v. Roberson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the entry of a directed verdict for defendant was appropriate. We say, no.
The legal standard for gauging the evidence on a motion for a directed verdict is well established and hardly needs repeating: “[A]ll evidence which supports plaintiffs claim must be taken as true and viewed in the light most favorable to him, giving him the benefit of every reasonable inference which may legitimately be drawn therefrom, and with contradictions, conflicts and inconsistencies being resolved in his favor.” Maness v. Fowler-Jones Construction…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Ragland v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Blake v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Maness v. Fowler-Jones Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Reeves v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vance Trucking Co., Inc. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Ligon v. MATTHEW ALLEN STRICKLANDCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Barnard v. N.C. Department of TransportationNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007
- Metcalf v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. EalyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.