Legal Opinion

State v. Strickland

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 28, 1995No. 13962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation, pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32, after the trial court concluded that the defendant had violated the terms of his probation. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his pro se motion to dismiss the violation of probation charges, (2) found the defendant in violation of probation, and (3) permitted him to exercise his right to waive counsel and to represent himself with standby counsel. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In August, 1985, the defendant pleaded guilty to a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. GethersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. GuckianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. State v. GuckianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Asherman v. MeachumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. OutlawConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Magee v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  5. State v. GalberthConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API