Legal Opinion

State v. Guckian

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 29, 1993No. 14577PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.

The state appeals from the Appellate Court’s determination that the defendant, William Guckian, who pleaded guilty to operating a motor vehicle while his license was suspended in violation of General Statutes § 14-215 (c)1 and to violating his probation contrary to General Statutes § 53a-32, was eligible for the state’s substance abuse treatment program (treatment program). The Appellate Court upheld the portion of the decision of the trial court in favor of the defendant’s eligibility. We granted the state’s petition for certification and now affirm.

The treatment program, created by No.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. DukesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. State v. MattioliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Doe v. MarselleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. McCoy v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  4. State v. MolloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. State v. KoslikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API