State v. Moore
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendant, Jerome Moore, appeals from the judgment, rendered by the trial court, finding him in violation of his probation pursuant to *9General Statutes § 53a-32 with respect to his conviction of burglary in the third degree. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the sentencing court improperly stayed his burglary sentence until he had completed a prior sentence for an unrelated drug conviction, thus making the burglary sentence a nullity, and (2) the court hearing the violation of probation abused its discretion in finding him to be in violation. We affirm the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. RobersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. ReillyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BoydConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. BrunetteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- State v. RestbergsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.