Legal Opinion

State v. Gethers

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 3, 1985No. 11569PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

This appeal involves various aspects of a criminal defendant’s right to self-representation at trial, including whether he has a right to hybrid representation. On August 22, 1980, the defendant was charged by an information with tampering with a witness in violation of General Statutes § 53a-151. After entering a plea of not guilty to the charge, he was tried by a jury and found guilty.

On appeal, he raises claims that the trial court erred in that it: (1) caused him to conduct a portion of his trial alone without first obtaining a valid waiver of his state and federal constitutional right to…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API