Legal Opinion

State v. Guckian

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 31, 1992No. 9539; 9540PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The state appeals, with the trial court’s permission, from the judgment granting the defendant credit toward his prison sentence. The credit was based on the court’s determination that the defendant was eligible for state sponsored alcoholism treatment, after he pleaded guilty to operating a motor vehicle while his license was under suspension in violation of General Statutes § 14-215 (c) and violating his probation contrary to General Statutes § 53a-32.

The state claims the trial court (1) improperly found that a violation of General Statutes § 14-215 (c) is a crime within the meaning of…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Doe v. MarselleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. State v. CainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. State v. GuckianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. State v. MolloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API