Legal Opinion

State v. Varela

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1978No. 4378PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a sentence imposed upon Gregoris Morales Varela following his plea of guilty to possession of phenobarbital, a dangerous drug, in violation of A.R.S. § 32-1970(C) as defined in A.R.S. § 32-1901(9). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S. Supreme Court Rules, rule 47(e). We affirm.

We must deal with three issues on appeal:

1. whether there was a factual basis for the guilty plea as required by Rule 17.3, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure;

2. whether Varela has standing to challenge A.R.S. § 32-1970(C) as an unconstitutional delegation of legislative…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. BatemanArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bateman v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. People v. PoulinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. State v. CarrArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. RoweWashington Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. GetzArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. State v. SoddersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. State v. LammieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API