Legal Opinion

State v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 29, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 90-1316, 1 CA-CR 90-1322PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Presiding Judge.

This is defendant’s appeal from the judgment of guilt and sentence imposed following his plea of no contest to attempted armed robbery and from the judgment of guilt and sentence imposed following a jury trial for theft. We decide the following issues:

1. Was there a sufficient factual basis for defendant’s plea?

2. Did the trial court err by refusing to allow defendant to withdraw his plea?

I

Defendant argues that the trial court lacked a sufficient factual basis for his plea of no contest to attempted armed robbery. He contends that the elements of the crime…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. VarelaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. State v. RiveraArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. MohajerinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. State v. SalinasArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. LeyvaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API