Legal Opinion

Bateman v. Arizona

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided August 16, 1976No. A-110 (76-5033)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Rehnquist, Circuit Justice.

Applicant has filed a motion denominated an “Application for Bail Pending Certiorari or in the Alternative Application for Stay of Mandate of the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona.” Such an applicant — who, in effect, seeks to have a single Justice of this Court stay what the state-court system has concluded should not be stayed — bears a heavy burden of demonstrating that he meets the traditional tests which a Circuit Justice must consider in passing on an application of this sort. Because of the serious questions going to applicant's standing to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Mitchum v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Williams v. LaraTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Perry v. Del RioTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Burrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. KilgoreWashington Supreme Court · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API