Legal Opinion

People v. Poulin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1972No. Crim. 9883PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAY, J. *

Appellant appeals from judgment of conviction, after jury trial, of violation of Penal Code section 12310 (explosion of a destructive device causing great bodily injury).

Questions Presented

1. Is Penal Code section 12310 unconstitutional because the term “great bodily injury” fails to- establish a clearly defined standard of guilt?

2. Does the evidence support a finding of “great bodily injury”?

3. Was the instruction on great bodily injury erroneous?

4. Was the admission of the testimony of the bailiff error?

5. Was the admission of testimony in regard to prior offenses error?

6.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Greven v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. HeitzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. CovinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. RhoadesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People v. SalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API