Legal Opinion

State v. Lammie

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 29, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 89-216PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHELLEY, Judge.

Appellant Michael Patrick Lammie (defendant) was charged with four counts óf sexual assault. He later pled guilty to two amended counts of attempted sexual assault, class 3 felonies, pursuant to a plea agreement which advised him that he would be required to register as a sex offender. At sentencing, defendant for the first time stated “that on an attempted crime, that it is inappropriate to require the registration as a sex offender.” The trial court ordered him to register as a sex offender. Defendant appealed only from the requirement that he register as a sex…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wainwright v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. PeekArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. Blankenship (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Artway v. Attorney General of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  5. State v. CornishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API