Mohn v. . Cressey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The basic reason of the motions to dismiss the action is the alleged want of jurisdiction. Ered L. Cressey says: (1) That he is the only defendant; that the summons, which was issued by a justice of the peace in Craven County and addressed to an officer of Edgecombe County, is void, and that the court had no jurisdiction of his person; (2) that no publication of the summons has been made; and (3) that the Farmers Banking and Trust Company, whose funds were attached, is not a party to the action. The Citizens National Bank of Boston rests its motion substantially on the ground first above set…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hornthal v. . BurwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Winfree v. . BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Grocery Company v. Bag Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Best v. British & American Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Jenette v. Hovey & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chinnis v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Lovegrove v. LovegroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Edwards v. Brown's Cabinets & Millwork, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Bethell v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Voehringer v. . PollockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.