McKinney v. . Sutphin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClahksoN, J.
The sole question involved in this appeal: Does the intervener, U. G. Belton, allege facts sufficient to entitle him to the surplus in the hands of the trustee? We think so.
The intervener’s plea sets forth: (1) On or about 1 February, 1925, E. F. McKinney and wife conveyed to U. G. Belton a. certain tract of land, describing it. (2) That in the conveyance made and by agreement between E. F. McKinney and U. G. Belton, the said Belton assumed the payment of $1,000 and interest from 1 February, 1925, the actual amount due on a deed of' trust on the same land made by E. F. McKinney and wife to T.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ripple v. Mortgage & Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Planters National Bank of Virginia v. Wysong & Miles Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Parlier v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Flowers v. SpearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Lockhart v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Harvey v. Kinston Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Kenyon Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Clark v. Hood System Industrial Bank of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.