Legal Opinion

DiMartino v. CITY OF ORINDA

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 2000No. A085725PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

Introduction

The City of Orinda (City) appeals from a judgment of the Contra Costa County Superior Court, finding the City liable in inverse condemnation for the presence of a storm drainpipe under the residence of plaintiffs, husband and wife Robert B. DiMartino and Lise K. Tong. The City contends the evidence is insufficient to support findings that the City substantially participated in the construction, management or operation of the storm drainpipe or that it exercised dominion or control over the drainage pipe or that the pipe was part of a community-wide public…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Christina N.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Singh v. Southland Stone, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Angela G.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I & IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Schmir v. SchmirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API