Legal Opinion
In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I & II
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 2005No. A109805PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, Acting P. J.
In this coordinated proceeding, the trial court concluded that it lacked personal jurisdiction over four nonresident foreign defendants: Honda Motors Co., Ltd. of Japan (Honda), Volkswagen AG of Germany (Volkswagen), Nissan Motor Ltd. of Japan (Nissan) and the Canadian Automobile Dealers’ Association (CADA) of Canada. As such, it granted motions to quash service of summons brought by each of these defendants. Plaintiffs1 appeal, contending that the three parent manufacturers (1) are subject to the specific jurisdiction of California courts under the stream of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cashel & EmlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I and IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Burdick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- In Re Automobile Antitrust Cases I and IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- ViaView, Inc. v. RetzlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.