Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Pamela Riley
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) filed suit for a declaratory judgment to determine its obligation, if any, to pay underinsured motorist benefits to Pamela Riley under her father’s insurance policy. As we conclude that Nationwide is not so required, we affirm the District Court’s decision to grant summary judgment to Nationwide.
I. Facts and Procedural History
In July 1997 insurance agent P. Kowa-lewski issued Arthur Riley, Pamela Riley’s father, a personal automobile insurance policy with Nationwide that provided un-derinsured motorist…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. ColbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gallagher, B., Aplt. v. Geico IndemnitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Adrian Lupu v. Loan City LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Kohn v. SCHOOL DIST. OF CITY OF HARRISBURGDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Butta v. Geico Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Alderson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.