Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Pamela Riley

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 18, 2003No. 00-1961PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) filed suit for a declaratory judgment to determine its obligation, if any, to pay underinsured motorist benefits to Pamela Riley under her father’s insurance policy. As we conclude that Nationwide is not so required, we affirm the District Court’s decision to grant summary judgment to Nationwide.

I. Facts and Procedural History

In July 1997 insurance agent P. Kowa-lewski issued Arthur Riley, Pamela Riley’s father, a personal automobile insurance policy with Nationwide that provided un-derinsured motorist…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. ColbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gallagher, B., Aplt. v. Geico IndemnitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Adrian Lupu v. Loan City LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Kohn v. SCHOOL DIST. OF CITY OF HARRISBURGDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Butta v. Geico Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Alderson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API