Legal Opinion

Butta v. Geico Cas. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-675PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKearney, District Judge

Under section 1738 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law effective in July 1990, a Pennsylvanian buying auto insurance may pay increased premiums to stack his underinsured motorist coverage to provide more coverage for another vehicle insured by his family in the same household by the same insurer. He is entitled to this stacking unless he signs a form waiving this right. Avoiding the form waiver, insurers introduced "household exclusions" precluding stacking underinsured coverage when the vehicle involved in the accident is not listed on every insurance policy issued to family…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. Sheridan v. NGK Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. In the Interest of L.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kline, B. v. Travelers Personal Security Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Smith v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Stockdale v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Kline, B. v. Travelers Personal Security Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. BUTTA v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API