Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Colbert

OPINION

Chief Justice ZAPPALA.

This matter comes before this Court on a Petition for Certification of Questions of Law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.1 We granted the Petition, which certifies two distinct questions for our review: (1) whether the definition of “insured” in the automobile *85insurance policy of Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company impermissibly narrows and conflicts with the statutory definition of “insured” as contained in Section 1702 of Pennsylvania’s Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1799.7; and…