Legal Opinion

McCardel v. Smolen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1976No. Docket 22696PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

This appeal brings to the Court for the fourth time a dispute over beach access rights in platted Higgins Lake subdivisions. All of the litigants own property in the "First Addition” to Michigan Central Park Subdivision. Lots in the subdivision are separated from the waters of Higgins Lake by a strip of land designated on the plat as Michigan Central Park Boulevard. The boulevard was dedicated to the county, ostensibly as a public street. But the "boulevard” is actually nothing more than undeveloped beach property. We are asked to decide who owns the riparian rights in the boulevard frontage…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Collins v. GerhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Beach v. HaynerMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Winans v. WillettsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Pigorsh v. FahnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thies v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McCardel v. SmolenMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. 2000 Baum Family Trust v. BabelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Thom v. RasmussenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. 2000 Baum Family Trust v. BabelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API