Legal Opinion

McCardel v. Smolen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1978No. 59186, (Calendar No. 13)PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Plaintiffs, who own subdivision lots facing Higgins Lake, commenced this action to enjoin the defendants, who own interior lots in the subdivision, from using the beach and water.

A strip of land between the lake and the lots owned by plaintiffs and others ("front lots”) is designated on the plat 1 as Michigan Central Park Boulevard; "streets and allies [sic] as shown on” the plat were "dedicated to the use of the public”. The boulevard has not been developed or maintained as a roadway or "opened” to vehicular traffic; 2 it is covered with underbrush and trees except along the water’s edge…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Helvering v. PfeifferSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Potomac Steamboat Co. v. Upper Potomac Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Middlebrooks v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Thies v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lisa Tyra v. Organ Procurement Agency of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  5. 2000 Baum Family Trust v. BabelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API