Legal Opinion

Collins v. Gerhardt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1926No. Docket No. 66PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

The plaintiff, a resident of Toledo, Ohio, owns 120 acres of land on both sides of the Pine river in Dover township, Lake county, Michigan. This river is a well known trout stream. It has been stocked by the State. The plaintiff claims the exclusive right of fishery in that part of the stream which flows through his land. Accordingly, at the point where it enters his premises he has strung three strands of barbed wire across from shore to shore and has posted notices warning the public to keep out. On the 21st of May, 1925, the defendant was fishing in Pine river. Disregarding the warning…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Moore v. SanborneMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Willow River Club v. WadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Muench v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People Ex Rel. Baker v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Johnson v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API