Legal Opinion · Dissent

2000 Baum Family Trust v. Babel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2010No. Docket 139617Published

1DissentDavis, J.

I respectfully dissent, because I conclude that long-settled precedent establishes that a “statutory ‘base fee’ ” is a fee ownership title capable of cutting off riparian rights and no precedent from this Court has established a contrary rule.

“At the common law, when the owner of land has laid it out into village lots, intersected with roads and public squares, such roads and squares are dedicated to the public use. But it is not the fee of the land which passes in such cases; the public have only an easement in the land, the fee itself for all other purposes remains in the owner.” Wanzer v…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Rathbun v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. County of Wayne v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Village of Grandville v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API