Pigorsh v. Fahner

Pee Cueiam.

Upon leave granted (383 Mich 795) we review and affirm the respective judgments of the circuit court and of the Court of Appeals. For those judgments and the presently mentioned factual findings of both courts, see 22 Mich App 108.

Decisions establishing the “rule of property”1 which of right control disposition of this case were gathered in Putnam v Kinney, 248 Mich 410 (1929). Putnam is “on all fours” here. These decisions go back to the simple proposition that one who is owner *514in fee of all of the upland surrounding one of our wholly private inland lakes, a lake having no…