Legal Opinion

2000 Baum Family Trust v. Babel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2010No. Docket 139617PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

This case involves riparian rights.1 Specifically, the parties ask us to decide an issue that was treated as unsettled by the lower courts: who possesses riparian rights to a portion of a lake, persons who are owners of property fronting the lake but separated from the water by a public road or a county road commission that has accepted a statutory dedication of the road and maintains it as such? The trial court ruled that the property owners (plaintiffs) did not possess riparian rights, and the Court of Appeals affirmed, further holding that the road commission (defendant) was in “no way”…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Kevin Krohn v. Home-Owners Ins CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  2. David Shoemaker v. City of HowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. Beckie Price v. High Pointe Oil Co IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Holton v. WardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Morse v. ColittiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API