Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Ashcroft
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 28, 2006No. Civil Action No.: 04-1158 (RMU)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying in Part and Granting in Part the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 1
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court on the federal defendants’ 2 motion for summary judgment. The pro se plaintiff, Emanuel Johnson, Jr., brings an employment discrimination claim, alleging that the defendants discriminated against him when he was employed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and by the District of Columbia (“D.C.”) Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”). The federal defendants move to dismiss the case, arguing primarily that the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- More v. SnowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Chandler v. BernankeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Johnson v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Johnson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Johnson v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.