Legal Opinion

Vavold v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2009No. 35339PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

Appellant Jerry E. Vavold appeals from the summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. Vavold seeks a new sentencing hearing based upon ineffective assistance of counsel and violation of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. Vavold argues that the Court should retroactively apply to his case the rule announced in Estrada v. State, 143 Idaho 558, 149 P.3d 833 (2006), which held that a right to counsel attaches to a psychosexual evaluation. Because Vavold fails to address in his briefing to this Court the untimeliness of his petition under I.C. § 19-4902(a), we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. YakovacIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Estrada v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. CreechIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hall v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Evensiosky v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Castorena v. General ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Martin v. Camas County ex rel. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Fuller v. DAVE CALLISTERIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Kriebel v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Martin v. CAMAS COUNTY EX REL. BD. COM'RSIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API