Legal Opinion

State v. Yakovac

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2008No. 34171PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Both Appellant Shami L. Yakovac and the State petitioned for review of the Idaho Court of Appeals’ decision affirming Yakovac’s judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance, and affirming in part, reversing in part and remanding the order summarily dismissing her application for post-conviction relief. We affirm Yakovac’s conviction and affirm the district court’s order dismissing her petition for post-conviction relief.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant Shami L. Yakovac was convicted of possession of methamphetamine after a jury trial in Bannock…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. FodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Rhoades v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. DeRushé v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. PayneIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hayes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API