Castorena v. General Electric
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
This action, consolidated on appeal, arises out of grants of summary judgment in favor of defendant-respondent corporations (General Electric, et al.; A.W. Chesterton Co., et al.; and FMC Corp., et al.) (collectively, “Respondents”) on the grounds that the plaintiffs-appellants’ (Mildred Castoreña, et al.; Willis E. Norton, Sr.; and John D. Adamson, et al.) (collectively, “Appellants”) wrongful death claims were barred by the condition precedent to Idaho’s wrongful death statute, because the statute of limitations for the decedents’ actions had run prior to their deaths. On…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Ochoa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Northern Pacific R. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Northern Pacific Railway Company v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Spangler v. McQuittyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Martin v. Camas County ex rel. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Mummert v. AlizadehCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- McCann v. McCannIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Fuller v. DAVE CALLISTERIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.