Legal Opinion

Estrada v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2006No. 30821/32755PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

This Court has granted Appellant Krispen Estrada’s request for review of an Idaho Court of Appeals decision upholding the district court’s denial of Estrada’s petition for post-conviction relief. The petition was grounded on Estrada’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim, which was based on his attorney’s failure to advise Estrada of his Fifth Amendment privilege to refuse to submit to a court-ordered psychosexual evaluation for sentencing purposes.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In the underlying criminal case, Estrada pleaded guilty to the rape of his estranged wife.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. PayneIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Gonzales v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API