Legal Opinion

Briga v. Ken-Tuck Signs, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1980No. 1073PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

The appellant filed an appeal from an award of a panel of arbitrators. The appellee filed a motion to quash the appeal on the grounds that the appellant had not complied with a Lackawanna County Rule of Court which requires that where an appeal from arbitration is taken by the plaintiff, the appeal shall be accompanied by a Complaint. The Court below granted the motion to quash, and the appellant has appealed that order to this Court.

This Court has declared that technical non-prejudicial errors will not bar an appeal from arbitration: Menarde v. Southeastern Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pomerantz v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Meta v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Menarde v. Southeastern Pennsylvania TransporTation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Lehman v. MoodySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lough v. SpringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Wilk v. Girard BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Hines v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Munn v. SchellenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API