Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. Nixon
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:. The appeal in the instant case is from a multi-faceted order entered in a support action. Unfortunately, the record is inadequate to permit appellate review.
The facts which are ascertainable from the record disclose that Earl Nixon, Sr., appellant, and Annie P. Nixon, appellee, were married in Philadelphia in 1953. A son, Earl, Jr., was born on October 20, 1953. The marriage fell upon hard times, and the parties separated in 1957. On August 12, 1959, an agreed support order was entered which directed appellant to pay $60 bi-weekly for the support of his wife and son. Later in…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Pomerantz v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- General Mills, Inc. v. SnavelySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sanders v. SandersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Laczkowski v. LaczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Gray v. State Farm InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. RoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.