Pomerantz v. Goldstein
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANDERINO, Justice.
Appellant, Maurice Goldstein, individually and trading as Franco-American Jewelers, was the defendant in an assumpsit action filed by appellees, Max and Bella Pomerantz, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia. After an arbitration award in favor of appellant, appellees filed for a trial de novo and on June 11, 1974, in a nonjury trial, the judge entered a judgment of $7,350.00 in favor of appellees. Findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are optional under Pa.R.Civ.P. 1038(b), were not made by the trial judge. On June 19, 1974, appellant filed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McKay v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Godina v. OSWALDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- In Re Estate of ChiaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by62 opinions
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Womer v. HillikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Zappala v. Brandolini Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- McDaniel v. Merck, Sharp & DohmeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.