Legal Opinion

Wilk v. Girard Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1985No. 01039PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the lower court abused its discretion in granting appellee Girard Bank’s petition to open the judgment entered on a compulsory arbitration award in favor of appellants Wilk. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the lower court’s order as to the opening of the judgment.

The relevant facts are ably summarized in the lower court’s opinion as follows:

[Appellants] commenced an action in trespass against Girard____ [T]he action was referred to compulsory arbitration. Counsel for Girard, Carolyn A. Johnson, filed an entry of appearance and an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Maize v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. MacKanick v. RubinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Gallardy v. AshcraftSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Interstate Restaurants, Inc. v. Halsa CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rieser v. GlukowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Lough v. SpringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Power v. TomarchioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Stivers Temporary Personnel, Inc. v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Hines v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API