Legal Opinion

Meta v. Yellow Cab Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1972No. Appeal, No. 748PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Packer, J.,

The greatness of the common law as a system of jurisprudence is ascribable to the principle that a rule which has no reason for its present existence should not defeat substantial rights. A corollary of that principle is the recognized practice of the courts to disregard matters de minimis.

A right of appeal is unquestionably a substantial right. In 1968 it was expressly made a constitutional right, Pa. Const., Art. V, §9. As to compulsory arbitration proceedings, the constitutional right to appeal from the decision of the arbitrators was held to be mandated in view of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Prichard v. Willistown Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Schrenkeisen v. KishbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Harry C. Erb, Inc. v. Shell Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Beth-Allen Sales Co. v. Hartford Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. MacKanick v. RubinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Weber v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. James F. Oakley, Inc. v. Sch. Dist. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Black & Brown, Inc. v. Home for the Accepted, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Dickerson v. HudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API