Legal Opinion

Hines v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1992No. 2459 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, Judge.

Before the Court is an appeal by Mary Hines (appellant) from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which granted Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority’s (SEPTA) motion to quash her appeal of an arbitration award for failure to comply with the notice requirements under Pa.R.C.P. No. 1308. We affirm.

Appellant filed a complaint against SEPTA on September 21,1987, alleging damages for personal injuries sustained in an accident involving a defective seat on a SEPTA trolley on September 25, 1985. Prior to an arbitration hearing, settlements were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meta v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. James F. Oakley, Inc. v. Sch. Dist. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Black & Brown, Inc. v. Home for the Accepted, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Lough v. SpringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Pullium v. Laurel School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diaz v. HouckCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Southern Chester County Concerned Citizens Organization v. Zoning Board of Lower Oxford TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Munn v. SchellenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Beltz, S. v. Ethicon Women's Health and UrologySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. G.M. Martinez v. Reading Area Water AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API