Legal Opinion
Townsend v. Perry
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 10, 1941No. Civ. No. 11562PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
From an order directing the receiver to deliver the possession of property, both real and personal, and from an order refusing to vacate the former order, the defendant Perry has appealed.
Heretofore H. 0. Harrison and Daisy Harrison, his wife, were the owners of lot 23 of tract 2289 in the city and county of Los Angeles, together with the building standing thereon occupied as a hotel and for certain business purposes. On May
I, 1930, they executed promissory notes in the sum of $500,000 in favor of Lane Mortgage Company and to secure the payment thereof they executed a trust deed naming the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fish v. FishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- De Forrest v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Schomer v. R. L. Craig Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bolich v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Pacific Railway Co. v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Physicians Electric Service Corp. v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Baumann v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942