Bolich v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogkdeN, J.
Does the depression or unprecedented scarcity of money for ordinary transactions or enforced stagnation of the real estate market constitute an equity sufficient to warrant a court in restraining the exercise of the power of sale in a .deed of trust ?
The power of a court of equity to restrain sales of real estate made in pursuance of the terms of a mortgage or deed of trust is undoubted, and the decisions of this Court disclose that the restraining power of equity in proper cases has been frequently exercised. However, the exercise of the beneficent powers of equity has usually been based…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Muller's Adm'r v. StoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
- Pelletier v. Greenville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Dunn v. McCoySupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Lipscomb v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Doggett Lumber Co. v. ConradesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Fifth Ave. Bank of N.Y. v. CompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Kontz v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Woltz v. Asheville Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Loma Holding Corp. v. Cripple Bush Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.