Legal Opinion

Fish v. Fish

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13399PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Application for a writ of supersedeas. Petitioner brought this action for separate maintenance and division of property. Respondent Jacobson was ap pointed receiver and respondent Guerin was named as Ms attorney. The defendant husband failed to appear in the action, but by private arrangement the property rights of the spouses were fully settled. The receiver thereupon filed his report and final account with the trial court, praying that the same be allowed and settled, that the disposition of the property in his hands be directed and that his compensation and that of his attorney be fixed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grant v. Superior Court of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. Superior Court of the State in and for S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Grant v. Los Angeles & Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Free Gold Mining Co. v. SpiersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re Marriage of SkelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Lesser & Son v. SeymourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API