Legal Opinion

Physicians Electric Service Corp. v. Adams

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1947No. Civ. 15690PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

Physician’s Electric Service Corporation, a California corporation, was granted an injunction forbidding a copartnership to use the fictitious name Physician’s Electronic Service. Testimony before the trial court shows that the plaintiff has used its name, either as a fictitious name or as a corporation since 1928. The business consists in selling to physicians, and servicing, electrically operated machines used in the treatment of diseases, such as lamps for heating purposes, and machines using tubes to change electric energy into short wave radio impulses. The defendants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoover Co. v. GrogerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Hoyt Heater Co. v. HoytCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. California Prune & Apricot Growers' Ass'n v. H. R. Nicholson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Carolina Pines, Inc. v. Catalina PinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Larson v. Blue & White Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colvig v. KSFOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Hair v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Vita-Var Corp. v. Alumatone Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1949
  4. Industrial Photo Service v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API