De Forrest v. Coffey
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate against the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. Y. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of .the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as judge of the superior court, to make an order granting leave to the petitioner to bring an action against E. J. Le Breton, as receiver of the California Safe Deposit and Trust Company, a banking corporation, to recover from said receiver the sum of twenty-one hundred dollars alleged to be in his possession but belonging to the petitioner.
The petition for the writ sets forth, [referring to its recitals in a general way], that for a long time prior to the thirtieth day of October, 1907, the California Safe Deposit and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. Superior Court of the State in and for S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Tapscott v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Petaluma Savings Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Taliaferro v. LockeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Anderson v. Great Republic Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Chiesur v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Lissner v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Ostrowski v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.