Legal Opinion

Baumann v. Harrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1942No. Civ. No. 11712PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODELL, J. pro tem.

This appeal was taken from an order denying a motion to satisfy a judgment for costs.

The plaintiff sued to foreclose a deed of trust on real property in Los Angeles. The property was sold at a trustee’s sale under a power contained in the deed and a decree was entered confirming the sale and awarding a deficiency judgment against the principal defendants. Rentals had been collected by the defendants W. G. Lane and Lane Mortgage Company and in the same decree the plaintiff was awarded a judgment against them in the sum of $12,584.33, of which $8,584.33 was declared to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Baumann v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Baumann v. BedfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Baumann v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Townsend v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owen v. BeauchampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Owen v. BeauchampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API