Legal Opinion

Santa Barbara Lumber Co. v. Ross

California Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1920No. L. A. No. 6103PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

Defendants appeal turns upon the exemption from execution of premises covered by a homestead declaration by Antonina Cicero, April 28, 1913, held valid by the trial court. By foreclosure of their deed, given as security, the plaintiff has succeeded to the rights of Carmelo Cicero and his wife, Antonina Cicero, in and to the premises claimed as a homestead. It is admitted by the pleadings that the husband and wife resided upon the premises, owned by them as tenants in common, at the time of the declaration of homestead by the wife, and up to the time of the trial had resided thereon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mulcahy v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Matcha v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. Johnson v. BraunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. State Athletic Commission v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API