Legal Opinion

Mulcahy v. Buckley

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1893No. 14669PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment enforcing a mechanic’s lien for the value of labor performed, and materials furnished in repairing and altering certain buildings and structures on two lots of the defendant situate in the city and county of San Francisco; and comes here on the judgment-roll without any bill of exceptions.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury; and the only points made by appellant are that the court erred in that it failed to find on certain alleged issues.

1. In paragraph VIII of the complaint it is alleged in due form that plaintiff filed and recorded…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. San Francisco Gas Co. v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. West Coast Lumber Co. v. NewkirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Loveland v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Goodell v. BlumerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Rapp v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Rochkind v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Dietlin v. General American Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API